Archive | April, 2014

Spring 2014 Review: Silicon Valley

7 Apr

The men of Silicon Valley

The humor in Silicon Valley is very different than that of the show it’s paired with after Game of Thrones on HBO, Veep, but the two share a different commonality which makes them an apt pairing: they’re both insider-y takes on very insular communities. Both shows welcome outsiders in to laugh and learn about their community’s peculiar quirks and allow insiders to nod their head at the all-too-familiar world they recognize on screen.

Where for Veep it’s the political arenas of Washington D.C., for Silicon Valley, it’s the tech world of well, Silicon Valley. I’m not anything close to an insider, but even just from having read occasionally about Silicon Valley and stories of the inanity that goes on there, I notice at least some of the shout outs to the absurd eccentricities of the area’s culture, such as the ridiculous company names, the claim that every product no matter how mundane and business-facing makes the world a better place, the reverence towards tech billionaires, and the ludicrously lavish parties.

Of course successfully parodying Silicon Valley is one thing and I’m sure to locals that’s more valuable in and of itself; I have no way to confirm this, but from what I’ve read Silicon Valley is pretty much spot on. But is it funny or enjoyable to outsiders? It is, and it’s warm, and honestly, it’s a story that it’s kind of shocking we haven’t seen yet, considering what a big part of American culture the tech startup world has become since the first dot com bubble of the late ’90s and the rise of Facebook. The only other quintessential bit of startup pop culture in the 21st century is The Social Network, a much more serious reality-based story. Silicon Valley is a lighter tale about the way up, rather than a look back at what went right and what went wrong from the top, but parallels can certainly be drawn between the two.

Silicon Valley stars five twenty-to-thirty somethings. a couple of whom work at a google-esque major tech company (Hooli) during the day and devote their nights towards working on their own startup enterprises at their house, owned by Erlich, an entrepreneur who had a semi-successful startup and sold out for a fair but not ridiculous amount of money. Erlich calls his house an incubator and owns ten percent of each tenant’s company rather than charge rent. Richard Hendrix, our protagonist, has been working a site called Pied Piper designed to help songwriters find out if their songs violate existing copyrights.

The stakes ramp up when a couple of very important people in the tech world – the CEO of Hooli, Gavin Belson, and venture capitalist billionaire Peter Gregory (whose right-on-point TED talk on the dangers of attending college the boys attended earlier) discover that within Hendrix’s worthless start up is a mega-valuable piece of technology, setting off a quick bidding war between the two for Hendrix’s company. Belson offers him $10 million for everything, but Gregory offers him $200,000 for 5% of the company, advice, and the chance to grow it himself. After having a panic attack, and with some persuasion from Gregory’s female employee Monica (I particularly note female because she is pretty much the only woman to appear so far in the show; perhaps that’s yet another accurate rendition of Silicon Valley culture – this show doesn’t even approach passing the Bechdel test).

Hendrix brings all his friends aboard and sets out to start a company.  The quest is then, as Richard expresses when he tries to give a short speech towards the end of the pilot, to build and grow a hugely successful enterprise, and feel good doing it, all while avoiding the dystopian hive mind of Silicon Valley that he and the others are sick of, and which can be as insidious as it is hilarious.

Silicon Alley is a spin on a classic losers/underdogs against the world theme, but there’s one big difference.  There’s not up against the big, hulking, charismatic jocks – instead, Silicon Valley is run by the nerds; the only difference between nerds and gurus are a couple of billion dollars.  The main characters may be classic nerds, but they’re not Big Bang Theory nerds; there’s a fine line between natural awkwardness and uncomfortable no-real-people-are-like-this behavior and certainly in the first episode Silicon Valley stays well to the former side of the line and I have no reason to think that it will deviate from this.

As the credits rolled, I was pretty excited to follow their journey with them. While it doesn’t have the hook of an edge-of-your-seat-gripping drama, it was exceedingly easy to watch, and if there was another episode available at the time I would have popped it on right away.

Will I watch it again? Yes. Networks have reputations that preceed them, and HBO is held to a pretty high standard. Thankfully, this looks like another strong effort. Next episode, please.

End of Season Report: Brooklyn Nine-Nine, Season 1

2 Apr

The team at the nine-nine

 

The bounds of genres are constantly blurring these days and not everything which broadly fits in the box labeled “comedy” has the same exact aims, which make these shows harder to compare against one another than ever before. If a comedy is laugh-out-loud funny, then it’s succeeded regardless of anything else. Some comedies, however, may be less funny, but have captivating characters or plots, and those are also worth watching regardless of anything else. It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia is at its best hilarious; it doesn’t attempt character development or serial plots and that’s okay. Girls isn’t as funny but it focuses on character and fascinating themes and that’s good too. Shows like Parks and Recreation meet somewhere in the middle. Parks and Recreation has probably been my favorite comedy of the past few years, but that’s not to say that a funnier show that’s lighter on characterization or vice versa couldn’t ascend to the top spot if it’s simply that good at what it does well. In fact, my favorite two comedies this past year were Eagleheart which is hyper-absurd and hilarious but takes place in a world without any sort of consistent characterization, and Enlightened, whose status as a comedy mostly boils down to the fact that it’s a half hour; it’s more depressing than most of the serious drama series currently airing.

That’s not specifically relevant to Brooklyn Nine-Nine more than any other new comedy, but these thoughts were consuming my headspace as I considered Brooklyn Nine-Nine’s first season, its progression, and expectations for future seasons.

Brooklyn Nine-Nine is the best new comedy of the season. It’s funny right off the bat. Brooklyn Nine-Nine’s closest analogue is Parks and Recreation, which is no coincidence as it’s created by Parks and Recreation veterans Dan Goor and Michael Schur. The episodes have been relatively consistent from the start, certainly by new comedy standards, and some of the characters that I didn’t love early on I’ve warmed to over the course of the season (Rosa and Gina in particular).

Goor and Schur have managed to tap Andy Samberg’s manic energy and apply a solid dose of restraint which smartly keeps his character from being over the top. One of the lessons learned from the creators’ experience was to follow the Leslie Knope rather than the Michael Scott model – Samberg’s Jake Peralta may be an immature doofus but he’s relentlessly competent at his job.  This core competency allows his other silly qualities to serve as distractions and potential detriments, while the viewer is able to understand why those around him put up with him.

Certainly the characters aren’t fully formed but that’s okay. Everybody started out with a type – Jake is immature, Rosa stoic and scary, Amy a by-the-book go-getter, Charles, a klutz, Captain Holt, dry and indecipherable, Terry, strong but gentle, and Gina just a total weirdo. The show worked its way from there, feeling around, mixing and matching characters, which is what most good comedies do, allowing actors and characters to find their strengths. There’s still some work to be done on the character development front, but the progress is there – the characters feel much more like people than they did at the start of the season. Charles, for example, soon became the resident foodie; while this hobby was mined for laughs, the point was also made that Charles actually did have great taste, and it gave him a positive quality to stand on rather than simply always serving as a lackey to Jake. Likewise, Gina, while definitely still the cast weirdo (we haven’t mentioned Hitchcock and Scully, Brooklyn Nine-Nine’s two headed answer to Parks and Recreation’s Jerry, but they’re not really fully-fledged characters in this sense) got her chance to shine when she showed she knew how to pick the best computer expert for the district to hire.

Two major plot points over the course of the season are worth discussing. First, the writers chose to go in the direction of potential romance between Jake and Amy. That’s fine, but all things being even I’d have preferred they didn’t. As I’ve trumpeted many times before, one of my favorite aspects of 30 Rock was the fact that its primary two characters were iron-clad platonic friends, and there aren’t enough comedies that follow that model. It won’t seriously affect my enjoyment of the show, and who knows, I’ll probably be rooting for the two of them to get together eventually. Still, I’d like to at least once for the record put down my small objection to this choice.

The second is, and I think and hope they’ve gone away from this for good, Charles’ unrequited crush on Rosa. This is putting it mildly; if it was just an unrequited crush, it’d be fine at least for a while, but it felt dangerously creepy and it made me uncomfortable watching a show that otherwise is not in for particularly awkward comedy. Fortunately, Charles found a love interest halfway through the season, and although she’s no longer part of the show, I hope that the creators learned a lesson. I wonder if the writers were thinking this exactly when they placed a fake out in the season finale – Charles wakes up next to someone after a drunken night getting over his breakup, and while I was terrified it was Rosa, it was rather Gina, which should lead to funnier and less relatively uncomfortable circumstances.

Within a few episodes, my friends and I were quoting memorable lines from the show, and in my circle, quotation is an important currency for a comedy. While it’s not a one-to-one relationship, if a show gets quoted a lot, it’s probably high up in the collective comedy rankings. Sample recurring Brooklyn Nine-Nine quotes include everything about Charles’ pizza blog and Terry’s forgetting how to breathe.

I’m very happy with the show’s first season, but it is a first season, and f it continues to grow, Brooklyn Nine-Nine could be the new Parks & Recreation by the time that Parks & Recreation (I hate to admit it, but it can’t last forever) is off the air. Those are big shoes to fill, but a season’s worth of Brooklyn Nine-Nine has me hopeful that this show has that in it.